Question 1

When the Police Improperly Obtained Evidence?

Accepted Answer

Seeking suppression of evidence that law enforcement inappropriately obtained without a warrant or probable cause is one action that can benefit your defense. The Fourth and Fifth Amendments provide extensive protections against unreasonable search and seizure and self-incrimination. Therefore, a court can suppress any tainted evidence in a case, sometimes casting doubt on the prosecution’s claims. Excluding the evidence can also lead to a dismissal.

Question 2

How Your Attorney Can Suppress the Critical Evidence Brought By the Prosecution?

Accepted Answer

Your attorney has several options they can use to throw out (suppress) or bar critical evidence from being used against you. Fourth Amendment rights violations -When police seize weapons or drugs without a search warrant or probable cause, it violates search-and-seizure laws and a defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights. If this occurs, the judge can throw out the court case. Miranda Rights violations - Police must inform you of your right to remain silent or read your Miranda Rights or warning when they arrest you. If you do not know these rights and the police question you anyway, your attorney can dispute the statements as a Fifth Amendment violation. Contamination - If law enforcement improperly handles DNA samples or blood during the collection process, the defense attorney can question the accuracy of that evidence. In turn, the court will frequently suppress the evidence. Inadmissible hearsay - A prosecutor cannot introduce evidence, such as audio or witness testimony, that is considered hearsay. For example, prosecutors cannot use an out-of-court statement to prove guilt, as hearsay rules prevent this. You can’t prove credibility if the evidence is hearsay. Prejudicial evidence - A judge may exclude evidence that may unfairly bias a jury or that a prosecutor uses to elicit an emotional response. For example, a judge may disallow a lawyer from showing crime scene photos that are upsettingly bloody or gory. Therefore, a defense lawyer can use the above information to suppress evidence just as much as they can use other pieces of information to pose reasonable doubt in the jury's minds. That is why the facts in a case are so critical to your eventual success or the outcome of your trial.

Question 3

How A Lawyer Can Use Favorable Evidence in a Defense Trial?

Accepted Answer

Once more, a skilled criminal defense lawyer can strategically use certain pieces of favorable evidence to argue for their client's innocence or raise reasonable doubt. Talking Points and Examples Below are some examples of how an attorney can present this evidence: Alibi evidence - Security camera footage, cell phone records, eyewitness statements, and similar information may be used to show the defendant was physically elsewhere at the time/date of the alleged crime. This directly counters the prosecutor’s charges. Digital forensic evidence - A lawyer may mine metadata, activity logs, and audit trails from electronic devices and account online services to challenge accusations of cybercrime activities. Doing so allows them to demonstrate any misattributions or fabrications. Contradictory eyewitness testimony - If accounts from the prosecution’s witnesses conflict significantly with previous testimony, a defense attorney will challenge the credibility and certainty of the account. Expert witnesses - Retaining qualified experts to critique forensic evidence or collection practices may be used to cast doubt on the conclusions drawn by investigators. Character witnesses - Testimony about upstanding behavior and integrity helps negate the prosecutor’s theories about a criminal disposition or culpability. Evidence and exclusionary rules - Once more, documenting illegal search practices without warrants or probable cause allows legal counsel to suppress the resulting evidence under 4th Amendment protections. Any of the above strategies can undercut the elements of an alleged criminal offense. Therefore, defense lawyers can use these tactics to support a more assertive criminal defense.

Question 4

How Attorneys Manage the Collection of Evidence: How It All Begins?

Accepted Answer

After discussing your case and asking questions, your attorney is ready to collect the critical evidence for your case. When gathering evidence to build a defense in a criminal case, good defense lawyers typically start by: Reviewing the prosecution’s evidence and discovery materials - Carefully examining police reports, investigator notes, forensic analysis, witness statements, and all items the prosecutor uses against their defendant allows lawyers to assess what evidence they need to rebut or undermine in their defense case. Interviewing the defendant extensively - To construct an alternative theory of events, identify additional witnesses, and defend a client’s constitutional rights, if the police violated them, a lawyer needs to know the defendant's full version of what occurred. Identifying gaps and flaws in the prosecutor’s allegations - Determining where pieces of physical evidence may be lacking or where the testimony seems contradictory enables defense lawyers to know where to show reasonable doubt. Exploring alibis and character evidence - Pursuing confirmation of the defendant's reported activities/ or whereabouts through security footage, receipts, posts, and witness statements can be used to powerfully dispute the prosecutor’s evidence. Investigating alternate explanations - Examining other forms of circumstantial evidence often involves the help of private investigators who help reconstruct the crime scene. Using the above tactics allows lawyers to achieve acquittals, dismissals, and reduced sentences.

Question 5

What to Do If You’re Innocent and Accused Falsely of a Crime?

Accepted Answer

When falsely accused of a crime, your criminal defense attorney will defend you by aggressively investigating the alleged offense while considering strategic legal maneuvers based on the evidence. Their efforts will largely focus on the following. A thorough vetting of the prosecution’s theory, forensics, and witness statements. Doing this will allow the lawyer to probe for inconsistencies, procedural errors, lying, or alternate explanations about the events of the case. The identification of solid, contradictory, and exculpatory sources of evidence- video, digital records, receipts, reputable witnesses - all of which can set the tone for a factual narrative. The filing of motions before trial seeking the exclusion (suppression) of improperly collected evidence - information that violates any constitutional protections against unreasonable searches and self-incrimination. Extensively preparing the defendant and favorable witnesses to give confident testimony during a trial, countering specious accusations and falsehoods. Presenting the other side with affirmative proof of innocence, demanding withdrawal of the charges, and pleading to trial if refused. A lawyer’s duty, when collecting evidence against false charges, means protecting the rights of their client and making sure the true version of the events continues to be recognized.

Category: Criminal Defense

The Role of Evidence in California Criminal Trials

Common Mistakes to Avoid After Being Arrested in California

Driver’s License Restoration in Orange County

Limited Driving Privileges in Orange County

Driver’s License Hearings in Orange County

If I’m Charged With Drug Crimes in Los Angeles, What Should I Do?

273.5 California Statute

What Are the Consequences of Sex Crime Charges?

Should I Take Theft Crime Charges Seriously?

I Was Accused of Domestic Violence. Now What?

LUCIA

Contact Us Now